Spec comparison
| Spec | Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour | Victor Auraspeed LJH |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Yonex | Victor |
| Price | $150 | $160 |
| Weight | 83g (4U) | 83g (4U) |
| Balance | Head Light | Head Light |
| Shaft Flex | Medium-Stiff | Stiff |
| Skill Level | Intermediate | Advanced |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.5 | ★★★★★ 4.5 |
| Power | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Speed | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Control | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Defense | 8/10 | 9/10 ✓ |
| Overall | 32/40 | 33/40 |
The verdict
For raw all-round performance the Victor Auraspeed LJH edges ahead, but the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour delivers the best value for money and the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour is the cheaper option at $150. If you smash a lot, pick the racket that scored higher on power; if you play fast doubles, prioritise the higher speed score.
Pros & cons
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour
- Quick handling
- Friendly flex
- Strong club doubles racket
- Less elite control
- Modest smash power
- Mid price
Victor Auraspeed LJH
- Excellent swing speed
- Outstanding defence
- Pro pedigree
- Limited power on full smashes
- Stiff flex demands timing
- Premium price
FAQ
Is the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour better than the Victor Auraspeed LJH?
Victor Auraspeed LJH wins on overall performance (33 vs 32 across our four metrics), but the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour leads in no categories while the Victor Auraspeed LJH leads in defense.
Which is cheaper, the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour or the Victor Auraspeed LJH?
The Yonex Nanoflare 800 Tour is cheaper at $150, compared with $160 for the Victor Auraspeed LJH.
Which racket is better for beginners?
Beginners are usually better served by the more forgiving frame — favour the racket with the more flexible shaft and even balance, and avoid extra-stiff models until your technique is consistent.
Or compare with…
Still not sure?
Answer 5 quick questions and get a personalised racket recommendation.
Take the Racket Quiz →