Spec comparison
| Spec | Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro | Victor Auraspeed LJH |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Yonex | Victor |
| Price | $200 | $160 |
| Weight | 83g (4U) | 83g (4U) |
| Balance | Head Light | Head Light |
| Shaft Flex | Stiff | Stiff |
| Skill Level | Advanced | Advanced |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.7 | ★★★★★ 4.5 |
| Power | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Speed | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Control | 9/10 ✓ | 8/10 |
| Defense | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Overall | 34/40 | 33/40 |
The verdict
For raw all-round performance the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro edges ahead, but the Victor Auraspeed LJH delivers the best value for money and the Victor Auraspeed LJH is the cheaper option at $160. If you smash a lot, pick the racket that scored higher on power; if you play fast doubles, prioritise the higher speed score.
Pros & cons
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro
- Excellent swing speed
- Sharp control
- Brilliant in defence
- Limited raw smash
- Stiff shaft is demanding
- Premium price
Victor Auraspeed LJH
- Excellent swing speed
- Outstanding defence
- Pro pedigree
- Limited power on full smashes
- Stiff flex demands timing
- Premium price
FAQ
Is the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro better than the Victor Auraspeed LJH?
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro wins on overall performance (34 vs 33 across our four metrics), but the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro leads in control while the Victor Auraspeed LJH leads in no categories.
Which is cheaper, the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro or the Victor Auraspeed LJH?
The Victor Auraspeed LJH is cheaper at $160, compared with $200 for the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro.
Which racket is better for beginners?
Beginners are usually better served by the more forgiving frame — favour the racket with the more flexible shaft and even balance, and avoid extra-stiff models until your technique is consistent.
Or compare with…
Still not sure?
Answer 5 quick questions and get a personalised racket recommendation.
Take the Racket Quiz →