Spec comparison
| Spec | Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro | Li-Ning Bladex 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Yonex | Li-Ning |
| Price | $200 | $170 |
| Weight | 83g (4U) | 83g (4U) |
| Balance | Head Light | Head Heavy |
| Shaft Flex | Stiff | Stiff |
| Skill Level | Advanced | Advanced |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.7 | ★★★★★ 4.5 |
| Power | 7/10 | 9/10 ✓ |
| Speed | 9/10 ✓ | 7/10 |
| Control | 9/10 ✓ | 7/10 |
| Defense | 9/10 ✓ | 6/10 |
| Overall | 34/40 | 29/40 |
The verdict
For raw all-round performance the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro edges ahead, but the Li-Ning Bladex 900 delivers the best value for money and the Li-Ning Bladex 900 is the cheaper option at $170. If you smash a lot, pick the racket that scored higher on power; if you play fast doubles, prioritise the higher speed score.
Pros & cons
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro
- Excellent swing speed
- Sharp control
- Brilliant in defence
- Limited raw smash
- Stiff shaft is demanding
- Premium price
Li-Ning Bladex 900
- Aggressive smash power
- Aero-frame head speed
- Premium feel
- Demanding stiff shaft
- Limited defensive feel
- Premium price
FAQ
Is the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro better than the Li-Ning Bladex 900?
Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro wins on overall performance (34 vs 29 across our four metrics), but the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro leads in speed, control, defense while the Li-Ning Bladex 900 leads in power.
Which is cheaper, the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro or the Li-Ning Bladex 900?
The Li-Ning Bladex 900 is cheaper at $170, compared with $200 for the Yonex Nanoflare 800 Pro.
Which racket is better for beginners?
Beginners are usually better served by the more forgiving frame — favour the racket with the more flexible shaft and even balance, and avoid extra-stiff models until your technique is consistent.
Or compare with…
Still not sure?
Answer 5 quick questions and get a personalised racket recommendation.
Take the Racket Quiz →