Spec comparison
| Spec | Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z | Victor Auraspeed 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Yonex | Victor |
| Price | $230 | $90 |
| Weight | 78g (4U) | 83g (4U) |
| Balance | Head Light | Head Light |
| Shaft Flex | Stiff | Medium |
| Skill Level | Advanced | Intermediate |
| Rating | ★★★★★ 4.8 | ★★★★☆ 4.2 |
| Power | 8/10 ✓ | 6/10 |
| Speed | 10/10 ✓ | 8/10 |
| Control | 8/10 ✓ | 7/10 |
| Defense | 9/10 ✓ | 8/10 |
| Overall | 35/40 | 29/40 |
The verdict
For raw all-round performance the Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z edges ahead, but the Victor Auraspeed 80 delivers the best value for money and the Victor Auraspeed 80 is the cheaper option at $90. If you smash a lot, pick the racket that scored higher on power; if you play fast doubles, prioritise the higher speed score.
Pros & cons
Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z
- Blazing swing speed
- Effortless fast drives
- Superb defensive blocks
- Less raw smash mass
- Stiff shaft needs technique
- Premium price
Victor Auraspeed 80
- Easy fast handling
- Forgiving flex
- Friendly price
- Modest attacking ability
- Plain build
- Not for singles
FAQ
Is the Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z better than the Victor Auraspeed 80?
Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z wins on overall performance (35 vs 29 across our four metrics), but the Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z leads in power, speed, control, defense while the Victor Auraspeed 80 leads in no categories.
Which is cheaper, the Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z or the Victor Auraspeed 80?
The Victor Auraspeed 80 is cheaper at $90, compared with $230 for the Yonex Nanoflare 1000Z.
Which racket is better for beginners?
Beginners are usually better served by the more forgiving frame — favour the racket with the more flexible shaft and even balance, and avoid extra-stiff models until your technique is consistent.
Or compare with…
Still not sure?
Answer 5 quick questions and get a personalised racket recommendation.
Take the Racket Quiz →