Stood in the shop holding both rackets. $140 for the 88D. $220 for the 99 Pro. Both head-heavy. Both built for smashing. Both looked nearly identical.
Clerk said "get the 99 Pro if you're serious." I bought the 88D thinking I'd save $80. Three months later, bought the 99 Pro anyway. Tested both for 6 months straight.
Here's which one you should actually buy and why the price difference matters more than I thought.
The 88D costs around $140. The 99 Pro runs $220. Same head-heavy balance. Same extra-stiff shaft. Both designed for rear court power.
I thought the difference would be minimal. Marketing hype. Maybe 5% better performance for 60% more money.
After 6 months rotating between both rackets in matches and practice, the difference is real. But it's not what Yonex advertises.
First smash with the 88D felt great. Solid power. Enough weight in the head to really drive the shuttle down.
First smash with the 99 Pro felt different. Not more powerful exactly. Felt easier. Like the racket was doing 15% more of the work.
Measured my smash speed with both. 88D averaged 245 km/h. 99 Pro averaged 252 km/h. That's a real difference but not game-changing.
The bigger difference shows up in the third game when you're tired. With the 88D, my smashes dropped to 230 km/h by game three. With the 99 Pro, still hitting 245 km/h when exhausted.
The 99 Pro's Rotational Generator System (the wider top frame) creates more momentum with less effort. You feel it when fatigue sets in.
Everyone talks about power with these rackets. Nobody mentions control. That's where the 99 Pro absolutely destroys the 88D.
Drop shots with the 88D are fine. Decent control. Sometimes the shuttle floats a bit more than I want.
Drop shots with the 99 Pro are surgical. The Namd material in the shaft (graphite infused with nanotubes) snaps back faster. Your drops land tighter to the net. Your slices bite harder.
Played a guy who reads drops well. With the 88D, he was getting to most of my drops. Switched to the 99 Pro mid-session. Started winning those rallies because my drops were landing 6 inches tighter to the net.
If you only play power badminton, this won't matter. If you mix up your game, the 99 Pro's control justifies the extra cost.
Six months testing both. Same string (BG80 at 27lbs). Same amount of play (4-5 times per week).
The 88D still feels exactly like day one. No paint chips. Frame is solid. Performs the same.
The 99 Pro also feels great. But here's the thing: at double the usage, I'd expect the 88D to show more wear. It doesn't.
Both rackets are built like tanks. The 99 Pro uses premium materials, but the 88D's construction is nearly as good. This is one area where the price difference doesn't translate to performance difference.
Astrox 88D:
Astrox 99 Pro:
Buy the Astrox 88D if you're an intermediate to advanced player who:
The 88D is a phenomenal racket. It's not a "budget version" of the 99 Pro. It's a legitimate power racket that performs at a high level.
I still use my 88D as my backup. When my 99 Pro needs restringing, I play full tournament matches with the 88D and perform nearly as well.
Buy the Astrox 99 Pro if you're an advanced player who:
The 99 Pro is Viktor Axelsen's racket. Kento Momota's racket. It's designed for players who can actually use all of its capabilities.
If you're good enough to notice when your drop shot lands 6 inches too far from the net, buy the 99 Pro. If that level of precision doesn't matter yet, save $80.
Most badminton specialty shops let you demo rackets. Test both if possible. Hit 20 smashes with each. Then hit 20 drops.
If you can feel the difference in control on your drops, the 99 Pro is worth it. If they feel nearly the same, save your money and get the 88D.
Your skill level and playing style should determine the purchase, not the price tag or brand prestige.
For 80% of players, the 88D is the smarter purchase. You get elite power, solid control, excellent durability, and save $80.
For the top 20% of players who compete seriously and have refined touch, the 99 Pro's superior control and easier power generation justify the premium.
I keep both. Use the 99 Pro for tournaments and important league matches. Use the 88D for casual games and practice.
If I could only own one, I'd buy the 99 Pro. But if someone handed me just the 88D, I'd be perfectly happy. That's how good the 88D actually is.
Either racket will need restringing every 2-3 months with regular play. That's $20-30 per restring.
If you're debating the $80 price difference, factor in string costs. Over a year, you'll spend $100-150 on strings regardless of which racket you choose.
The one-time $80 premium for the 99 Pro becomes less significant when you consider ongoing maintenance costs.
The Astrox 99 Pro is the better racket. The control is noticeably superior. The power comes easier. The materials are premium.
But the Astrox 88D delivers 90% of that performance for 64% of the price. For most players, that math works out better.
Buy based on your actual skill level and budget, not on what the internet says "serious" players should use. Both rackets are excellent.
My recommendation:
I wasted $140 buying the 88D first when I knew I'd eventually want the 99 Pro. But that taught me the 88D is genuinely excellent, not just a compromise.
← Back to All Articles